 |
|
|
|
|
4. FUEL-TO-STEAM EFFICIENCY |
|
|
This
is the ratio of BTU output divided by BTU input on a particular boiler.
This includes all the heat loss (e.g. radiation and convection losses)
from a boiler and is typically used in a manufacturer's catalouge.
Fuel-to-steam efficiency is a readily vertifiable number and is often
used in efficiency guarantees by various manufacturers. It is the ideal
"Fire-rate" efficiency which is tested for about 10 minutes with a
stack analyzer. Miura does not think the above efficiencies explain
"real-world" efficiencies. Each boiler runs under different operating
condition such as load, operating time, radiation heat losses from
boiler physical surface area and so on.
|
|
Boiler
efficiency is one of many factors in controlling overhead costs. It is
important to understand what boiler efficiency really means and how to
use them if you are serious in reducing overall operating cost in your
system.
Let's begin with the common definitions of efficiency as related to the boiler...
|
|
|
|
|
This
is the effectivness of the burner only and relates to its ability to
completely burn the fuel. The boiler or heat exchanger has little
influence on combustion efficiency. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
have developed a new definition of "IN-SERVICE EFFICIENCY" to describe
these savings. The Definition is: The resulting efficiency of a boiler
when the total operation cycles are taken into account such as day,
night, weekends, high loads, low loads, standby loads. It is a
comprehensive efficiency which is based upon an operating model and is
the "bottom line" efficiency, which should be used in any boiler
comparison. It reflects how well a particular boiler design handles a
particular operating model. |
|
| 2. THERMAL EFFICIENCY |
|
|
This
is the effectiveness of the heat transfer in a heat exchanger. It does
not take into account boiler radiation and convection losses.
|
|
|
| 3. BOILER EFFICIENCY |
|
|
Be careful when a salesperson mentions this term. This is a general term and must be clearly defined by the manufacturer. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The
basic difference between Fuel-to-Steam versus In-Service efficiencies
is that the Fuel-to-Steam efficiency is measured at a fixed fire-rate
and includes radiation and convection losses; In-Service efficiency
measures how well a particular boiler design responds from bank firing
(idling) to full fire under a projected operating schedule. For example
a 100% fire rate - which includes convection and radiation losses
(fuel-to-steam) - the efficiency of a typical firetube boiler for
natural gas at an operating steam pressure of 125 PSIG is about 81%.
Drop the fire rate (due to convection + radiation losses) to 25% for
the same boiler and the efficiency becomes about 78.5%. Likewise an
In-Service efficiency of a boiler at 100% load, (meaning full fire 24
hours per day, 365 days per year) will be equal to Fuel-to-Steam
efficiency. However, drop the steam load to 25%, (i.e. full fire for
six hours and idling for 18 hours) and the In-Service efficiency will
be much lower than 78.5% efficiency. Idle the boiler to keep it warm
and ready to deliver steam upon demand and the In-Service efficiency
becomes zero. In-Service efficiency is the most conservative approach
to efficiencies and should be considered in order to project what the
bottom line fuel consumption of a boiler should be. |
|
 |
|
| If
we want to know true fuel savings, it should be based on the In-service
efficiency because the above losses should be subtracted from the
Fuel-to-Steam efficiency. |
|